Scientometric Analysis of Research Methodology in Computer Engineering and Systems Thesis at UNAMBA
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The work carries out an analysis through scientometry in the research methodology section in the theses of Computer Engineering and Systems of the Micaela Bastidas de Apurímac National University located in the Andes region of Peru. The proposed objectives were to know the type, level, design, sample and technique of the investigations most used in the theses to choose the professional title of Ing. Informatics and Systems, the technique was the collection of data from the university repository having 46 theses for its analysis, having the results: After analyzing the information, it is concluded that the type of applied research is the most predominant, with 84.8%, and 58.5% see the preference of the level of explanatory research, regarding research design, the quasi-experimental approach is the most widely used with 50%, while the non-probability sampling is the most outstanding method with 71.1%. In addition, the most widely used data collection technique is the 29.5% survey. It should be noted that all the theses analyzed correspond to quantitative research, without a record of qualitative research, which represents a 100% quantitative approach.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Los nombres y las direcciones de correo electrónico introducidos en esta revista se usarán exclusivamente para los fines establecidos en ella y no se proporcionarán a terceros o para su uso con otros fines.
How to Cite
References
UNAMBA, “Repositorio Institucional UNAMBA - Escuela Profesional de Ingeniería Informática y Sistemas.” Accessed: Oct. 02, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://repositorio.unamba.edu.pe/handle/UNAMBA/843
W. W. Hood and C. S. Wilson, “La Literatura de Bibliometría, Cienciometría e Informetría,” Scientometrics, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 291–314, 2001, doi: 10.1023/A:1017919924342/METRICS. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342
J. A. Araújo Ruiz and R. Arencibia Jorge, “Informetría, bibliometría y cienciometría: aspectos teórico-prácticos,” ACIMED, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 5–6, 2002, Accessed: Oct. 02, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1024-94352002000400004&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
L. Michán and I. Muñoz-Velasco, “Cienciometría para ciencias médicas: definiciones, aplicaciones y perspectivas,” Investig. en Educ. Médica, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 100–106, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1016/S2007-5057(13)72694-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-5057(13)72694-2
P. Benjamin Lowry, D. Romans, and A. Mosiah Curtis, “Global Journal Prestige and Supporting Disciplines: A Scientometric Study of Information Systems Journals,” vol. 5, p. 51, 2005, Accessed: Oct. 02, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=666145
P. B. Lowry et al., “Evaluating Journal Quality and the Association for Information Systems Senior Scholars’ Journal Basket via Bibliometric Measures: Do Expert Journal Assessments Add Value?,” vol. 37(4), pp. 0–62, 2012. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.01
M. Ramírez Cruz and J. A. Vásquez Rúa, “Surgimiento y desarrollo del método Delphi : una perspectiva cienciométrica,” Biblios J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci., no. 71, pp. 90–107, 2018, doi: 10.5195/biblios.2018.470. https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2018.470
M. A. D. Olarte Pacco, M. D. Jhamyl Flores, K. J. Rios Vera, A. D. Quispe Ambrocio, and N. A. Seguil-Ormeño, “Tecnolo-gías de la Información y Comunicación ( TIC ) en la gestión empresarial : Un análisis cienciométrico,” Comuni@cción Rev. In-vestig. en Comun. y Desarro., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 388–400, 2023, doi: 10.33595/2226-1478.14.4.899. https://doi.org/10.33595/2226-1478.14.4.899
R. A. Jorge and F. de M. Anegón, “La evaluación de la investigación científica : una aproximación teórica desde la cienciome-tría,” pp. 1–27, 2008.
M. E. Cortés Cortés and M. Iglesias León, “Generalidades sobre metodología de la investigación,” p. 105, 2004, [Online]. Available: http://www.unacar.mx/contenido/gaceta/ediciones/metodologia_investigacion.pdf
R. Hernándes Sampieri, Metodología de la Investigación, 6th ed. México: McGRAW-HILL / INTERAMERICANA EDITORES, S.A. DE C.V., 2015.
R. Hernándes Sampieri, C. Fernándes Collado, and M. del P. Baptista Luicio, Metodología de la Investigación, McGRAW-H., vol. 9, no. 25. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.uv.mx/personal/cbustamante/files/2011/06/Metodologia-de-la-InvestigaciÃ3n_Sampieri.pdf
B. Nadia Ugalde and B. Francisco Balbastre, “Investigación cuantitativa e Investigación cualitativa: buscando las ventajas de las dIferentes metodologías de Investigación,” no. 2, pp. 179–188, 2013. https://doi.org/10.15517/rce.v31i2.12730
J. Corona Lisboa, “Apuntes sobre métodos de investigación,” MediSur, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 81–83, 2016, Accessed: Oct. 02, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1727-897X2016000100016&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=pt